Using the widely known values for masses of the sun and the earth, the distance and the force between the two, other percentages found on Google, in addition to the rate of expansion of the universe, I’ve correctly calculated a close approximation of the gravitational constant. Check it out!

* edit: I’ve clarified the only unexplained value of .007 used in the first attempt at this problem and have given it an even better approximated result (look at the last three photos)

* Another Update:
The latest value (I just added to my calculations) of gravitational acceleration at the poles was found to have more precision and thus turns out to be an even more accurate approximation (for what I’m aiming for).

Does this offset quotient of [ (hubble percentage rate) / (acceleration of gravity at the poles) ] subtracted from the .16 value used as a lower bound in my cg5 standard distribution parameter, make sense to anyone else?

I think it works. I see it as a way of reducing the atmospheric energy absorption with a sensitivity gradient. Otherwise, it’s perfect as a way of taking a standard deviation metric and applying a method to phase that value.